Type of Review: The journal employs a double-blind peer review process, where both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous to each other throughout the review phase to ensure impartiality and fairness.

Reviewer Selection: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, academic credentials, and prior experience in the subject matter of the manuscript. The editorial board maintains a pool of potential reviewers with high professional standards and a record of timely, constructive reviews.

Review Duration: The journal aims to complete the peer review process within 2 weeks from manuscript submission. However, this period may vary depending on the availability of reviewers and the level of revisions required.

Review Criteria: Manuscripts are evaluated based on their originality, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the field of quantum science and technology. Reviews are structured to provide detailed feedback on the manuscript's strengths and areas for improvement.

Decision Categories: The possible outcomes of the peer review process include Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, and Reject. Authors receive a summary of reviewer comments along with the editorial decision.

Revisions: Authors are expected to address all points raised by the reviewers and the editor, and to submit a revised version of their manuscript along with a detailed point-by-point response to the reviewer comments within a specified timeframe.

Appeals: Authors may appeal editorial decisions if they believe the review was unfairly conducted or contains serious errors. Appeals must be supported with a detailed justification, and are reviewed by an editorial panel different from the initial reviewers.

Confidentiality: All manuscripts under review are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers are instructed not to discuss, share, or use the information contained within the manuscripts prior to publication.

Ethical Standards: Reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to maintain objectivity and confidentiality in their assessments. Any suspected misconduct or plagiarism during the review process is investigated thoroughly.

This policy will help ensure that the review process is transparent, rigorous, and fair, supporting the publication of high-quality research in your journal.